Fps problems,

Post by **Azarael** » Thu 13 Jun , 2013 7:37 pm

You guys miserably underestimate UT2004.

Post by **Calypto** » Fri 14 Jun , 2013 1:14 am

Azarael wrote:Where are the graphics?

AMD APUs have built in graphics. Intel HD 4000 graphics can easily run UT2004 at 90 fps steady, so the APU will do even better.

Post by **iZumo** » Fri 14 Jun , 2013 7:45 am

That's really all there is to say on the matter.

I think Mercury will have a few low-fps zones with that. inb4 muh optimization.

Post by **Jiffy** » Sat 15 Jun , 2013 10:13 am

By any chance does setting UT2004's priority to High on Task Manager?

Post by **iZumo** » Sat 15 Jun , 2013 11:40 am

No (unless you run 1005642684065 viruses along with ut2004).

Post by **Azarael** » Sun 16 Jun , 2013 1:28 pm

Out of interest, what's the best you can do for $600?

Post by **Calypto** » Sun 16 Jun , 2013 5:08 pm

Azarael wrote:Out of interest, what's the best you can do for $600?

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/16ZPn

Post by **bOnO** » Sun 16 Jun , 2013 6:16 pm

or: http://www.ldlc.com/b-32dde5db13ac19cd.html

Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 XT With Boost 2 Go
AMD FX 8320 Black Edition (3.5 GHz -> 4 GHz) (8 1/2 cores)
Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (4 Slots RAM)
G.Skill NS Series 4 Go DDR3 1600 MHz CL11Kingston Value => RAM 4 Go DDR3 1600 MHz CL11 SR X8 (Hauteur 30 mm)
Cooler Master N200 Noir
SilverStone Strider Essential ST50F-ES230
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 SATA 6Gb/s 500 Go
LG GH24NS95 SATA Black

LDG-Gaming

Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Re: Fps problems,

Who is online