Glitching ban
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu 05 May , 2011 6:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
I honestly didn't intend to use redeemer. I just don't feel it's right and I knew it's glitching. I always used another deemer spawn in sky for 2nd obj nuking, since it's much more fair.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu 05 May , 2011 6:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
And if you think that I saved last rocket for nuking obj, I can say I didn't keep any rockets at all. Yes, I collected all four deemers and then wasted rockets, so at time of ban I didn't even had a single deemer.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
That's true though. A mapfix will sort this.Socio wrote:But why would one attacker use the Redeemer room? He cant use the Redeemer in the main combat area so he can only camp and wait for the 2nd obj with the Redeemer, which falls under the no-obj-camping policy Zolinymusz was permanently banned for. Also with the 2nd obj being active the Redeemer room is only accessible from defenders spawn, therefore making it a part of their spawn area, that should not be accessed by attackers. This map is stupid that way
Nah you came there to scout if defenders will try to go into the room and would nuke the obj if they didn't. Then as you said you thought you were glitching. I will check the logs too see whether you were told it's OK or not.UltraBloxX wrote:I honestly didn't intend to use redeemer. I just don't feel it's right and I knew it's glitching. I always used another deemer spawn in sky for 2nd obj nuking, since it's much more fair.
EDIT: Nothing in the logs.
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
It would take one of you 10 seconds to put a sentinel in the deemer room and it's fixed for all future situations. Instead of arguing semantics, just fix it.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
Yeah that will happen.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu 05 May , 2011 6:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
Well, OK. I'll tell whole truth why I was down there...
At first, I thought go to deemer room, take deemer, pilot it and wait for a chance when defender will use speedpad and sneak missile into main battle zone. So, that's reason why I was where you found me...
But when I got to deemer room and launched a missile, I began to worry whether that would be legitimate to do so. So, I decided not to test whether it was a glitch or not and just wasted all four missiles and stayed in deemer room. I had no more business here, really. Since I didn't want to do 1st obj, I just stayed here. I knew that using these deemers on 2nd objs is glitching, so I had no plans for doing that.
I was afraid, that admitting to piloting deemer missile would cause you to think that I intended to glitch 2nd obj, so I didn't tell that initially. Sorry.
Yes, I thought that getting into deemer room is glitch on it's own but I certainly knew that deemering 2nd obj is glitch and didn't intend to do so.
That's it.
At first, I thought go to deemer room, take deemer, pilot it and wait for a chance when defender will use speedpad and sneak missile into main battle zone. So, that's reason why I was where you found me...
But when I got to deemer room and launched a missile, I began to worry whether that would be legitimate to do so. So, I decided not to test whether it was a glitch or not and just wasted all four missiles and stayed in deemer room. I had no more business here, really. Since I didn't want to do 1st obj, I just stayed here. I knew that using these deemers on 2nd objs is glitching, so I had no plans for doing that.
I was afraid, that admitting to piloting deemer missile would cause you to think that I intended to glitch 2nd obj, so I didn't tell that initially. Sorry.
Yes, I thought that getting into deemer room is glitch on it's own but I certainly knew that deemering 2nd obj is glitch and didn't intend to do so.
That's it.
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
Perhaps if you were to came here and told it right away fair and square (and I still don't believe you with the last post, kinda looks like you're rather making a story) and that you had considered that it's legitimate then this would turn out differently.
Pharaoh has been removed from the maplist until this is fixed in the map.
Pharaoh has been removed from the maplist until this is fixed in the map.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu 05 May , 2011 6:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
I indeed thought that entering room is glitching on it's own. Indeed, nobody said it's OK to. However, I was explicitly told before that deemering 2nd obj with defenders deemer is glitch, so I never intended to do so. And since anyone could possibly record a demo, or admin could've find me in middle of doing so, I wouldn't be so stupid to do that.Nah you came there to scout if defenders will try to go into the room and would nuke the obj if they didn't. Then as you said you thought you were glitching. I will check the logs too see whether you were told it's OK or not.
EDIT: Nothing in the logs.
- Socio
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Mon 15 Feb , 2010 8:44 pm
- Location: Poland
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
Anyways, just a heads up, the ban has been shortened to 3 days, as I discussed the matter with Ultra in PMs.
> team-spec*Socio: i see a new rais map
> team-spec*Socio: curious if ikea
> H&some: its not
> H&some: its actually pretty good
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Glitching ban
Who's for making the OLDZ on 31st december and 1st January this time?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests