Unwheel
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Unwheel
+1
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Unwheel
It needs better physics, honestly.
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Unwheel
-1
It played well enough. Just more denied content if you ask me.
It played well enough. Just more denied content if you ask me.
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Unwheel
CONTENT FOR THE PLAYERS
- iRobot
- Junk Administrator
- Posts: 3909
- Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Unwheel
It looks like you spent a lot of time on that post.
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Unwheel
About 30 seconds!
-
- Disappeared Administrator
- Posts: 4196
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Unwheel
30 minutes for that post? WOW!
-
- Member
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Thu 31 May , 2012 10:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: Unwheel
Unwheel is totally different from RACE. I never understood why it was ever put on the RACE/AS server (?). A mapswitch from AS to Unwheel is a bit drastic. I personally never liked the gametype... Feels like a bad PS1 racing game to me. Doesn't the server get alot of RQ's by switching to unwheel?
Maybe it could be better to 'add' more stuff to the Unwheel server (like unarmed race or something) than to give the RACE/AS server more 'race' weight (inferior AS votes etc...).
Maybe it could be better to 'add' more stuff to the Unwheel server (like unarmed race or something) than to give the RACE/AS server more 'race' weight (inferior AS votes etc...).
- Azarael
- UT2004 Administrator
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm
Re: Unwheel
I think it was put on AS/Race because some guys foolishly assumed that people who played "Racing" wanted to race.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest