[Split] TAM/AM discussion

Discuss the Ballistic Weapons servers here.

Would you like to see TAM / AM on BW #1?

Yes, TAM / AM would be good
6
43%
No, let's stick to Freon only
8
57%
 
Total votes: 14

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iRobot » Sun 21 Jul , 2013 10:15 pm

Apples and oranges. You hide in freon because of the 100 second auto-thaw on people. TAM offers no such advantage.

Try it and see.

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iZumo » Sun 21 Jul , 2013 10:20 pm

So you wouldn't play stealthly if you were last man standing of your team?

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iRobot » Sun 21 Jul , 2013 10:29 pm

There's a difference in 'camping' and 'playing stealthily'

You're arguing people will extend the rounds for no reason other than to grief.

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by Azarael » Sun 21 Jul , 2013 10:31 pm

It's quite clear that some people have never played TAM.

Also, quite annoying that those who no longer or infrequently play BW, and/or have probably never played TAM are voting.

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iRobot » Sun 21 Jul , 2013 11:33 pm

Besides, there won't be as much people spectating as you may think, as 'modern' TAM servers all use the necro combo. It'd be nice to have an alternative than boosting!

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iZumo » Sun 21 Jul , 2013 11:49 pm

None of the TAM servers have 22 slots, they have half (10 or 12 slots) and of course their maplist reflects that, so you don't play hide & seek in the maps. You can't really hide in Rankin, Deck17 and maps like that even in Freon, because while there is a time limit, the entire enemy team will be against you. It's just not that straightforward as you say.

Example:
TAM in Goatswood: teams get reduced to 1on1 => both start sniping and play hide and seek, the rest just watches while being extremely bored!
facepalm
Azarael wrote:Also, quite annoying that those who no longer or infrequently play BW, and/or have probably never played TAM are voting.
Azarael wrote:If you modify LDGGameBW, add TAM and AM support and aimed death messages to the other gametypes, please. UTComp's death message class will handle them.
.=

User avatar
Azarael
UT2004 Administrator
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu 11 Feb , 2010 10:52 pm

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by Azarael » Sun 21 Jul , 2013 11:54 pm

Theorycraft will never replace practical experience of having TAM added.

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iRobot » Mon 22 Jul , 2013 12:01 am

The same 1vs1 situations happen in Freon, except instead of sniping you just have people standing next to frozen people thawing them at an agonizingly boring 4/sec, in overtime.

iZumo
Disappeared Administrator
Posts: 4196
Joined: Fri 19 Mar , 2010 1:21 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iZumo » Mon 22 Jul , 2013 12:16 am

Surely theorycraft doesn't replace practical experience, still gives some insight on the thing. Different slots (22 vs 12), different maps (big-mid-small vs mid-small), different play style (BW vs stock), different playerbase (mostly low and semi skill vs pro scene).

Well, there can be a test run from the 3SPN game class (coz all LDGGameBW stuff is made for Freon directly, i.e no UTComp addon, no ladder etc.), assuming giZmo approves that (he rather expressed being totally against that, due to waiting times for players with lower skill getting killed in the initial mashup).

User avatar
iRobot
Junk Administrator
Posts: 3909
Joined: Fri 06 Jan , 2012 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: [Split] TAM/AM discussion

Post by iRobot » Mon 22 Jul , 2013 12:21 am

Sure, but we're not pushing for a Freon replacement, TAM probably wont even get voted much if people are as against it as you seem to believe.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests